Best Viewed with IE or Opera. Sorry, Firefox works, but loses some sidebar layout,
'my profile' and other stuff... Anybody with a fix, please leave a comment. Many thanks in advance.

That said, if you must use Firefox (and I don't blame you, it's become my browser of choice, too)
...get the "IE Tab" extension. This allows you to view problem pages with the IE rendering engine. Very cool!

Saturday, August 12, 2006

Kung Fu Monkey: "Wait, Aren't You Scared?"

Errr, no. And if you are, you frankly should be a little goddam embarrassed.

No false bravado and it's not that I don't take terrorism seriously. I do,
which I why I voted for the guy who believed in securing our ports and
fighting terrorism with criminal investigation methods -- which is, if
we may remind everybody, how this particular plot was busted.

am just not going to wet my pants every time some guys get arrested in
a terror plot. I will do my best to stay informed. I will support the
necessary law enforcement agencies. I will take whatever reasonable
precautions seem, um, reasonable. But I will not be terrorized. I assume that the terror-ists would like me to be terror-ized,
as that is what is says on their nametag, rather than, say, wanting me
to surrender to ennui or negative body image, and they're just coming
the long way around.

Osama Bin Laden got everything on his
Christmas list after 9/11 -- US out of Saudi Arabia; the greatest
military in the world over-extended, pinned down and distracted; the
greatest proponent of democracy suddenly alienated from its allies; a
US culture verily eager to destroy freedoms that little scumfuck could
never even dream to touch himself -- I would like to deny him the last
little check on the clipboard, i.e. constant terror. I panic, they win.
To coin a phrase, Osama Bin Laden can suck my insouciance. link below >>>


I am absolutely buffaloed by the people who insist I man up and take it in
the teeth for the great Clash of Civilizations -- "Come ON, people,
this is the EPIC LAST WAR!! You just don't have the stones to face that fact head-on!"
-- who at the whiff of an actual terror plot will, with no apparent
sense of irony, transform and run around shrieking, eyes rolling and
Hello Kitty panties flashing like Japanese schoolgirls who have just
realized that the call is coming from inside the house!

I may have shared too much there.

To be honest, it's not like I'm a brave man. I'm not. At all. It just, well, it doesn't take that much strength of will not
to be scared. Who the hell am I supposed to be scared of? Joseph
Padilla, dirty bomber who didn't actually know how to build a bomb, had
no allies or supplies, and against whom the government case is so weak
they're now shuffling him from court to court to avoid the public
embarassment of a trial? The fuckwits who were going to take down the
Brooklyn Bridge with blowtorches? Richard Reid, the Zeppo of suicide
bombers? The great Canadian plot that had organized over the internet,
was penetrated by the Mounties on day one, and we were told had a TRUCK
FULL OF EXPLOSIVES ... which they had bought from the Mounties in a sting operation but hey let's skip right over that.
Or how about the "compound" of Christian cultists in Florida who were
planning on blowing up the Sears Tower with ... kung fu?

And now these guys. As the initial "OH SWEET MOTHER OF GOD THEY CAN BLOW US UP WITH SNAPPLE BOTTLES!!" hysteria subsides, we discover
that these guys had been under surveillance, completely penetrated, by
no less than three major intelligence agencies. That they were planning
on cell phones, and some of them openly travelled to Pakistan
(way to keep the cover, Reilly, Ace of Spies). Hell, Chertoff knew
about this two weeks ago, and the only reason that some people can
scream this headline:

"The London Bombers were within DAYS of trying a dry run!!!"

-- was because MI-5, MI-6, and Scotland Yard let
them get that close, so they could suck in the largest number of
contacts (again, very spiffy police work). The fact that these wingnuts
could have been rolled up, at will, at any time, seems to have
competely escaped the media buzz.

This is terrorism's A-game? Sack up, people.

this is not to do anything less than marvel as cool, well-trained,
ruthless law-enforcement professionals -- who spent decades honing
their craft chasing my IRA cousins -- execute their job magnificently.
Should we take this seriously? DAMN STRAIGHT we take this seriously.
Left unchecked, these terror-fanboy bastards would have gone down in
history. These cretins' intent was monstrous; they should, and will,
all go to jail for a very long time. This is the part where we all
breathe a sigh of relief that there are some actual professionals
working the job in some countries.

But God gave me a brain, and a modicum of spine. Taking something seriously, and panicking over it are two different things. I do not assign all dangers and risks equal value. Tight little freelance squads with leak-proof operational discipline, like the 7/7 guys, -- those I worry about. A nuke coming in through one of ridiculously open ports -- I am concerned.
Not bio-terror so much, because it's a shitty delivery mechanism. That
the Muslim population of England seems to be becoming radicalized
enough to sprout up these plots, that's not a good thing to consider.
al-Queda involvement -- good if true because this means their
recruiting is shitty: bad if true because this means they're back in
business: bad if false because it means al-Queda has indeed become a
"brand": but good if false because it reinforces the idea that they're
operationally crippled (and if Zwahari is involved, I personally would like a word with whatever idiot nation took their eyes of the ball and let him escape ...)

... You get the point. There are a million factors in this New World of Terror. You weigh 'em, you process, and then you move on.

move on, building a better international society so that luddite
fundamentalist criminal gangs/cults of personality are further and
further marginalized.

Or, if you don't understand 4th Generation
Warfare at all, you move on, bombing the shit out of nation-states and
handing your opponents massive PR victories. Either way, you move the
fuck on.

Maybe it's just, I cast my eyes back on the last century ...

FDR: Oh, I'm sorry, was wiping out our entire Pacific fleet supposed to intimidate us? We have nothing to fear but fear itself, and right now we're coming to kick your ass with brand new destroyers riveted by waitresses. How's that going to feel?

Yeah, you keep bombing us. We'll be in the pub, flipping you off. I'm
slapping Rolls-Royce engines into untested flying coffins to knock you
out of the skies, and then I'm sending angry Welshmen to burn your
country from the Rhine to the Polish border.

BE AFRAID!! Oh God, the Brown Bad people could strike any moment! They
could strike ... NOW!! AHHHH. Okay, how about .. NOW!! AAGAGAHAHAHHAG!
Quick, do whatever we tell you, and believe whatever we tell you, or

... and I'm just a little tired of being on the wrong side of that historical arc.

is it, folks. This is the world, from now on. Even assuming the War on
Terror is a not just a bad metaphor and there is an actual measurable
winning point*, the short
4GW struggles last fifty years or so. We're going to be stopping one or
two of these bastard mass-murder plots a year, minimum, for the rest of
our lives. Hell, the way terror tactics and tech evolve, five years
from now we're going to be pining for the dudes with the flammable juice boxes.

It's now part of our life. Let's try not to hop like the trained monkeys every time it happens.

I'm just pleased that for once, nobody --

before September 11th, this is going to play big," said another White
House official, who also spoke on condition of not being named, adding
that some Democratic candidates won't "look as appealing" under the

-- ahhhh. Never mind


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

free webpage hit counter